Skip to main content

Table 2 Subgroup analyses of PIV and OS in digestive system cancers

From: Pan-immune-inflammation value as a novel prognostic biomarker for digestive system cancers: a meta-analysis

Categories

Studies (patients)

HR (95% CI)

I2 (%)*

Ph*

Z

P

Cancer type

Digestive tract Cancer

14(4652)

1.689(1.504–1.896)

49.5

0.018

8.88

< 0.001

Colorectal cancer

7(2168)

2.178(1.786–2.657)

10.5

0.349

7.68

< 0.001

Esophageal cancer

5(1547)

1.656(1.373–1.996)

31.8

0.209

5.29

< 0.001

Hepatobiliary pancreatic cancer

2(298)

2.427(1.581–3.727)

69.9

0.070

4.05

< 0.001

Analysis method

Multivariate analysis

12(4022)

2.076(1.578–2.732)

83.4

< 0.001

5.22

< 0.001

Univariate analysis

13(4449)

2.630(1.700-4.068)

94.1

< 0.001

4.34

< 0.001

Sampling time

Within 1 week before treatment

7(1779)

1.960(1.411–2.724)

48.3

0.071

4.01

< 0.001

Before treatment

9(3171)

2.042(1.539–2.708)

84.1

< 0.001

4.95

< 0.001

Cutoff values

< 300

7(2570)

1.631(1.304–2.039)

46.3

0.083

4.29

< 0.001

≥ 300

9(2380)

2.692(2.466–2.937)

39.7

0.103

22.20

< 0.001

Sample size

< 300

9(1375)

2.741(2.505–2.999)

20.1

0.264

21.96

< 0.001

≥ 300

7(3575)

1.686(1.359–2.092)

55.8

0.035

4.75

< 0.001

Treatment strategy

Surgery

9(3730)

1.885(1.484–2.394)

59.1

0.012

5.20

< 0.001

Chemotherapy/Target therapy/Immunotherapy/Radiotherapy

6(1100)

2.237(1.656–3.023)

60.9

0.025

5.24

< 0.001

Study region

East Asia

10(3617)

1.828(1.450–2.304)

51.8

0.028

5.10

< 0.001

Other region

6(1333)

2.230(1.723–2.887)

63.7

0.017

6.09

< 0.001

  1. * The random effect model was used, when the I2 > 50% or Ph < 0.10, otherwise the fixed effect model was applied; OS overall survival; HR hazard ration; CI confidence interval; Ph P-value for heterogeneity based on Q test; P P-value for statistical significance based on Z test