Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Evaluation of C-reactive protein levels in patients with penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author

Year

Study Year of recruitment

Country

Study design

Age, y

Tumor stage

N(%)

LNM

N(%)

CRP threshold (mg/L)

No. of Subjects/Cases

Outcome assessment

Hs-CRP/CRP

HR(95%Cl)

Quality scores

Steffens, S. [13]

2013

1990–2010

Germany

PC

65.4(33–92)

≥T2:36 (45.6%)

16

(25%)

15

79/34 (43%)

Institution

CRP

5.58(1.79 ~ 17.42)

8

Li, Z.S. [16]

2016

2007–2014

China

PC

50(25–86)

T2:68 (54.8%)

≥T3:14 (11.3%)

60 (48.4%)

4.5

124/54 (43%)

Institution

CRP

8.416(0.976 ~ 72.583)

8

Li, Z. [17]

2016

2005–2014

China

PC

52 (25–86)

≤T1:57(33.1%);

T2:90(52.3%);

≥T3:25(14.5%)

84 (48.8%)

8.7

172/59 (34.3%)

Institution

CRP

3.706(1.531–8.972)

8

Ghoshal, A. [14]

2017

Not given

Sweden

PC

51(10.6)

Not given

Not given

10

50/8(12%)

Laboratory examinations

CRP

0.59(0.25 ~ 1.41)

7

Zhou, Q. [18]

2018

2009–2015

China

PC

54

T2-4:77 (97.5%)

47

(59.5%)

5.0

79/22(28%)

UCC

CRP

2.465(1.064 ~ 5.712)

7

Draeger, D. [2]

2021

2005–2019

Germany

PC

65.4 (13.8)

T2:107 (69%)

T3:43 (28%)

T4:6 (4%)

All;100%

10

156/74(47%)

Department

CRP

1.66(1.11 ~ 2.53)

8

Kawase, M. [19]

2022

2008–2019

Japan

PC

74 (63–82)

Tis:1(1.6%); T1: 21(32.8);

T2:14(21.9%); T3:17(26.6%); T4: 11(17.2%)

26 (40.7%)

2.1

58/28 (48%)

Department

CRP

3.536 (0.86–14.52)

7

Xue, T. [20]

2023

2006–2021

China

PC

55

T1:100(36.9%);T2:44(16.2%);T3:115(42.4%);T4:12(4.4%)

104(38.3%)

10

271/56 (20.7%)

Department

CRP

2.77(1.36–5.64)

8

  1. PC: prospective cohort; UCC: University Cancer Center; LNM = lymph node metastasis: CRP = C-reactive protein; Hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein