Skip to main content

Prognostic significance of T cells and NK cells in osteosarcoma: a dual-center retrospective study

Abstract

Background

There is no study on the relationship between peripheral blood different lymphocyte subtypes and the prognosis of osteosarcoma (OS). Therefore, this study aims to investigate the predictive value of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells for the prognosis of OS patients.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and preliminary laboratory indicators of patients with OS admitted from dual-center between January 2014 and January 2021. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to determine optimal cutoff values for different lymphocyte subtypes, with T cells, NK cells, and B lymphocytes subsequently stratified into high- and low-proportion groups based on their respective optimal cutoff values. Kaplan–Meier curve was employed to analyze the impact of different lymphocyte on survival time and status. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed on clinical and laboratory indicators to identify independent prognostic factors influencing the prognosis of OS patients.

Results

After screening 277 patients with OS, a total of 106 patients were eligible for this study. The median follow-up time was 36.00 months. At the last follow-up, patients were categorized as having a good prognosis if they survived or a poor prognosis if they died: good prognosis (n = 48) and poor prognosis (n = 58). Kaplan–Meier curve revealed that patients with a high proportion of T (Median overall survival: 41 months vs. 32 months, P = 0.007) and NK (Median overall survival: 44 months vs. 32 months, P = 0.004) cells had a better prognosis compared to those with a low proportion. Univariate analysis indicated that age, body mass index (BMI), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor size, Enneking stage, surgical method, and the proportions of T, NK, and B cells were associated with the prognosis of OS patients (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that Enneking stage (II vs. I, HR = 12.543, P = 0.015; III vs. I, HR = 29.078, P = 0.001), and the proportions of T and NK cells (HR = 0.466, P = 0.048; HR = 0.497, P = 0.029) were independent factors influencing the prognosis of OS patients (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The proportions of T and NK cells may serve as efficient and practical prognostic indicators for OS patients, with higher proportions often associated with a better prognosis.

Introduction

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common malignant bone tumor in adolescents and children, with an incidence rate of approximately 3.4 per 100,000 [1]. The current standard of treatment for OS primarily involves a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. However, due to its high malignancy and aggressiveness, patients face a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 60% [2]. Various factors influence the prognosis of OS, primarily categorized into clinical-pathological features, radiomics, and genomics. Although these factors play a crucial role in predicting the prognosis of OS, their predictive accuracy and applicability still have limitations.

Firstly, clinical-pathological features, such as tumor size, metastasis, Enneking stage, and surgical method, have been studied for prognostic evaluation in OS patients [3]. However, the clinical presentation of OS patients is complex, and no single clinical-pathological feature can accurately predict patient prognosis. In recent years, imaging indicators have also been utilized as prognostic factors for OS. Researchers have extracted imaging feature parameters from PET-CT and MRI scans of OS patients to construct prognostic models [4, 5]. Although these indicators have achieved certain effectiveness in prediction, there are still shortcomings in terms of measurement accuracy and sensitivity. In the field of genomics, especially single-cell genomics, there has been a recent emergence of novel sequencing technologies. Currently, recent advancements in sequencing technologies have led to the identification of several genes associated with the prognosis of OS. These genetic markers provided relatively accurate prognostic predictions at the molecular level [6]. However, the high cost of sequencing limits its accessibility, and the technology has not yet been widely integrated into clinical practice. Given these challenges, the need for a more accurate, practical, and easily measurable prognostic indicator remains critical.

Laboratory parameter testing is convenient, operationally simple, and cost-effective. In recent years, the prognostic value of laboratory indicators in OS has been increasingly emphasized. Early research found that a high ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes could predict the chemotherapy response and overall prognosis in OS patients, highlighting the crucial role of lymphocytes in OS prognosis. However, the specific lymphocyte subtype responsible for this effect remains unclear [7, 8]. T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and B cells are the primary subtypes of lymphocytes. Researchers have explored the prognostic evaluation of patients in different malignant tumors such as gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and ovarian cancer by analyzing peripheral blood T, NK, and B lymphocytes, confirming their high predictive value [9,10,11]. However, there is currently no literature reporting on the relationship between different lymphocyte subtypes and prognosis in OS.

Hence, this retrospective study explores the correlation between the proportions of different lymphocyte in peripheral blood and the prognosis of OS. The objective is to identify an efficient, cost-effective, and practical predictive indicator, providing insights for the prognosis prediction of OS patients.

Materials and methods

Patients and study design

This study retrospectively analyzed patients with OS who were admitted from dual-center between January 2014 and January 2021. The criteria for inclusion were as follows: (1) Patients diagnosed with OS by histopathology; (2) Complete laboratory examination data; (3) Patients who had not undergone chemotherapy at their initial hospitalization; (4) Complete follow-up data. The criteria for exclusion were as follows: (1) Patients with immune system disorders (including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases); (2) Incomplete medical records; (3) Patients who had undergone chemotherapy or received immunosuppressive agents before their initial hospitalization; (4) Patients with concurrent infections, fever, or other malignant tumors; (5) Patients suffering from uremia, liver cirrhosis, liver failure, or other liver and kidney diseases affecting the immune system [12,13,14].

The study has received ethical support from their respective institutions (Approval number: 2024-E368-01). We confirmed that this study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki.

Clinical data and laboratory indicators

The clinical baseline data included the gender, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, Enneking stage, primary tumor site, pathological type, and treatment method. Laboratory indicators were blood samples collected from patients during their first hospitalization before chemotherapy. Tumor staging was defined using the Enneking stage system. Based on the malignancy determined by pathological histology, patients without metastasis were classified into stage I and stage II, while those with metastasis were categorized as stage III [15]. Because metastasis is highly correlated with the Enneking stage, this variable was not included. The treatment modalities in this study comprised surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Surgical interventions primarily included resection and amputation. For chemotherapy, both participating centers predominantly utilized the MAP regimen (high-dose methotrexate, cisplatin, and doxorubicin) administered as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. In refractory or recurrent cases, the IE regimen (ifosfamide and etoposide) was employed. Radiotherapy was reserved for unresectable tumors (e.g., jaw or pelvic lesions) or margin-positive lesions, with definitive doses of 60–70 Gy (1.8–2 Gy per fraction) and palliative doses of 40–50 Gy (3–5 Gy per fraction).

Lymphocyte subtypes were detected using a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Recently collected blood samples were placed into tubes containing heparin and analyzed promptly after staining with monoclonal antibodies. Lymphocytes were identified based on the CD45 or side scatter dot plots. A total of 5000 lymphocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry, and dual-parameter analysis was performed on lymphocyte surface marker antigens. The differentiation antigens for T cells were defined as CD3+/CD4 + and CD3+/CD8+, NK cells were defined as CD3-/CD16+/CD56+, and B cells were defined as CD19+. The percentages of each lymphocyte subtype were calculated [16]. Additionally, other laboratory indicators included C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) count.

Follow-up

For all OS patients, telephone follow-ups were conducted every 6 months. Overall survival was defined as the time from the diagnosis of OS to death or the last follow-up. Based on the follow-up duration at the endpoint, patients were categorized as having a good prognosis if they survived or a poor prognosis if they died, reflecting their overall survival status. The other follow-up endpoints included loss to follow-up and other non-tumor outcome events (including death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents, traffic accidents, or psycho-related causes, etc.). Ultimately, complete follow-up data were obtained for 106 OS patients in this study.

Statistical analysis

This study evaluated the predictive accuracy of risk features by establishing a 10-year receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The optimal cut-off values for T, NK, and B cell proportions were determined based on the ROC curve and Youden index (sensitivity + specificity − 1). These cut-off values were applied to classify patients into high and low proportion groups. Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier curves were employed to analyze the peripheral blood lymphocyte proportions and the prognosis of OS, and the statistical significance was tested by Log-rank.

Data compilation was executed through Excel 2016, and subsequent analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.0 software The measurement data following a normal distribution and a skewed distribution were respectively represented by the mean ± standard error and the median. The associations between the proportions of T, NK, and B cells, other important clinical parameters, and survival were assessed using the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Factors included in the analysis were tested for multicollinearity using linear regression, and the results indicated no evidence of multicollinearity among the independent variables. Cox regression models were used for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify independent factors predicting the prognosis of OS. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical baseline data of patients

After screening 277 patients with OS according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, this study ultimately enrolled 106 patients (Fig. 1). Final censoring date for follow-up was January 2024, and the median follow-up time was 36.00 months. At the last follow-up, 48 patients had a good prognosis, and 58 patients had a poor prognosis. The demographic information and clinical characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The cases in this study are included in a flow chart detailing the selection process for osteosarcoma patients

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of two groups of OS patients

Optimal cut-off values and Kaplan–Meier curve for lymphocyte proportions

The area under the curve (AUC) for the proportions of T, NK, and B cells was 0.702, 0.625, and 0.625, respectively. The optimal cutoff values were determined as 0.741 (sensitivity: 60.4%, specificity: 79.3%) for T cells, 0.099 (sensitivity: 58.3%, specificity: 67.2%) for NK cells, and 0.103 (sensitivity: 54.2%, specificity: 74.1%) for B cells (Fig. 2A-C). Based on the optimal cutoff values, 106 OS patients were grouped. There were 41 cases in the high T cell proportion group (≥ 0.741) and 65 cases in the low proportion group (< 0.741). Additionally, there were 47 cases in the high NK cell proportion group (≥ 0.099) and 59 cases in the low proportion group (< 0.099). Furthermore, the high B cell proportion group comprised 65 cases (≥ 0.103), while the low proportion group had 41 cases (< 0.103). (Table 1). According to the Kaplan–Meier curves, patients in the high proportion of T (Median overall survival: 41 months vs. 32 months, P = 0.007) and NK (Median overall survival: 44 months vs. 32 months, P = 0.004) cell groups exhibited a significantly better prognosis compared to the low proportion groups. (Fig. 2D, E), while there was no statistically significant difference in the prognosis associated with high or low proportion of B cell (P = 0.228) (Fig. 2F).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Optimal cut-off values and Kaplan–Meier curve for different lymphocyte proportions of T, NK, and B cells

Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis of clinical indicators and prognosis

To investigate the relationship between various clinical parameters and the prognosis of OS patients, we conducted univariate and multivariate Cox analyses on 106 patients to identify independent factors. In univariate Cox regression analysis, it was observed that the survival group had lower age (P = 0.002), BMI (P = 0.045), and CRP (P = 0.040) compared to the deceased group. Conversely, small tumor volume (P = 0.008), low Enneking stage (P < 0.001), and resection(P < 0.001) indicated better prognosis. Regarding peripheral blood lymphocytes, this study found that a T cell proportion greater than or equal to 0.741 (P = 0.002), NK cell proportion greater than or equal to 0.099 (P < 0.001), and B cell proportion less than 0.103 (P = 0.023) were indicative of a favorable prognosis for patients. There were no significant differences in the prognosis of patients with gender, WBC, primary site, pathological type of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P > 0.05). (Table 2). Finally, in the multivariate Cox analysis, age, BMI, CRP, tumor size, Enneking stage, surgical method, T cell proportion, NK cell proportion, and B cell proportion were included in the multivariate analysis. The results revealed that Enneking stage (II vs. I, P = 0.015; III vs. I, P = 0.001), T cell proportion (P = 0.048), and NK cell proportion (P = 0.029) were independent factors affecting the prognosis of OS patients. Specifically, T cell proportion ≥  0.741 and NK cell proportion ≥ 0.099 were identified as protective factors influencing the prognosis of OS patients (HR 0.466, 95% CI 0.219–0.992, p = 0.048; HR 0.497, 95% CI 0.266–0.930, p = 0.029) (Table 3).

Table 2 Association between OS patient data and prognosis in univariate analysis
Table 3 Association between OS patient data and prognosis in multivariate analysis

Discussion

OS is a solid tumor originating from mesenchymal tissue, characterized by its strong invasiveness and extremely poor prognosis, which make it imperative to search for novel prognostic indicators associated with OS prognosis. A total of 106 OS patients were enrolled in our study. Kaplan-Meier curves, along with univariate and multivariate Cox regression, revealed that a T cell proportion greater than or equal to 0.741, NK cell proportion greater than or equal to 0.099, and lower Enneking stage were associated with a better prognosis for patients. These factors are independent prognostic predictors in OS patients.

In this study, the T cell proportion emerged as an independent factor influencing the prognosis of OS. The anti-tumor function of T cells is primarily mediated through the T-cell receptor (TCR). Upon stimulation by tumor antigens, TCR interacts with major histocompatibility complex presented antigen complexes, generating effector T lymphocytes capable of traversing tissues and eliminating tumor cells [17]. In a retrospective analysis of 447 colorectal cancer patients, Tang et al. [10] similarly identified the T cell proportion as an independent factor affecting patient prognosis, with higher preoperative T cell proportion associated with better prognosis. This finding is consistent with our study, which revealed that individuals with a higher T cell proportion exhibited a 0.466 times lower risk of mortality compared to those in the lower T cell proportion group. Furthermore, Lu et al. [18] focused on the follicular helper T cells (Tfh) subtype within T lymphocytes. By using flow cytometry to assess Tfh expression in the peripheral blood of 148 OS patients, they discovered that OS patients had higher Tfh levels compared to benign tumor and normal groups, and those with high Tfh expression had a poorer outcome. Studies suggested that Tfh in OS can downregulate the expression of IL-21, affecting the activation of cytotoxic T cells and impeding their cytotoxic effects on OS [19, 20]. Despite the negative correlation between Tfh proportion and OS prognosis, considering the minimal proportion of Tfh within T lymphocytes and the primary role of effector T cells in tumor killing, we believe that peripheral blood T cells are a crucial factor influencing prognosis. An increased T cell proportion in peripheral blood enhances their cytotoxic activity against circulating tumor cells and promotes immune infiltration at the tumor site.

NK cells are also considered to be closely associated with the prognosis of OS patients. Unlike other immune cells, NK cells can non-specifically target and kill both tumor cells and virus-infected cells without requiring antigen stimulation. They achieve this by releasing cytotoxic substances, such as perforin and granzymes, which directly damage the tumor cell membrane, leading to tumor cell lysis and apoptosis [21]. A high proportion of NK cells has been shown to indicate better prognosis in various malignancies, including gastric cancer [9], colorectal cancer [10], and acute myeloid leukemia [22]. Similarly, in this study, patients with an NK cell proportion greater than or equal to 0.099 exhibited significantly better prognosis compared to those in the low NK cell proportion group. A higher proportion of NK cells can promote their non-specific killing of OS cells, making it a protective factor influencing the prognosis of OS patients. However, there is still some controversy regarding the relationship between B cells and tumor immunity. A study involving 72 cases of recurrent ovarian cancer found that individuals with a higher proportion of B cells experienced a better prognosis than those with a lower proportion, suggesting a positive correlation between the proportion of B cells and patient prognosis [11]. In contrary, other studies have shown that B cell infiltration is associated with poor prognosis in malignant tumors such as renal clear cell carcinoma and pancreatic cancer [23]. Additionally, research indicated that B cells can suppress the anti-tumor response of T cells by secreting inflammatory mediators such as IL-10, IL-35, and TGF-β, indicating that B cells may promote tumor progression [24, 25]. In our study, we observed a negative correlation between B cell proportion and the prognosis of OS patients. However, in multivariate analysis, there was no statistical difference, suggesting that the B cell proportion may be influenced by other factors and may not be an independent influencing factor for the prognosis of OS patients. Notably, comparing lymphocyte subtype proportion before and after chemotherapy as dynamic indicators could have significant potential value. Studies have shown that chemotherapeutic agents can affect the function and number of peripheral blood lymphocytes [26, 27]. When the total number of lymphocytes decreases, various lymphocyte subtypes undergo distinct changes. In contrast, the proportion of lymphocyte subtype prior to chemotherapy more accurately reflects the patient’s initial lymphocyte composition. However, the dynamic changes in lymphocyte proportion remain an important direction for future research.

Furthermore, our study found that the Enneking stage was also an independent factor affecting the prognosis of OS patients. The Enneking stage, as an important indicator of OS progression, is closely related to the tumor characteristics and disease development in patients. Specifically, patients in Enneking stage III, due to the presence of distant metastasis, usually have a poorer prognosis. Stages I and II are determined based on pathological findings, with stage II patients exhibiting higher tumor cell atypia and greater malignancy. As a result, compared to stage I patients, those in stage II experience faster tumor progression and worse prognosis. For this reason, the Enneking staging system was widely recognized in clinical prognostic evaluation [2, 28]. However, Enneking stage primarily relies on pathological and imaging examinations, and the limitations of biopsy samples and sampling errors may lead to staging discrepancies, which pose challenges for accurate staging, particularly in early-stage patients. While age, BMI, CRP, surgical method, and tumor size are not independent risk factors, the univariate analysis in this study revealed that they also impact the prognosis of OS patients. In the systematic meta-analysis of OS by Yi [29] and Song et al. [30], patients with high preoperative CRP levels were found to have a poorer prognosis. Similarly, our study also observed that OS patients with elevated CRP levels tend to have a worse prognosis. Previous studies have demonstrated that the tumor size significantly impacts both prognosis and chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma patients [7, 8], and our study also found that patients with larger tumor size have a worse prognosis. Meanwhile, Weng et al. [31], in a study of 3106 colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, investigated the preoperative white WBC. They found that patients in the high preoperative WBC group had lower overall survival rates (P = 0.002) and disease-free survival rates (P = 0.003) compared to the low WBC group. Nevertheless, our study found no statistically significant difference in the prognosis of patients with varying WBC levels, which could be attributed to the relatively small sample size. With advancements in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, resection has become a preferred option for more OS patients, maximizing the preservation of limb functionality. Multiple studies have demonstrated that the survival rate of OS patients undergoing resection is not lower than those undergoing amputation [32,33,34]. In our study, OS patients who underwent resection demonstrated a better prognosis compared to those who underwent amputation or received no surgical treatment. For OS patients with nerve and vascular invasion, amputation was typically the treatment of choice. In contrast, patients undergoing resection generally have a better overall condition and are usually free from nerve and vascular invasion, which may introduce some bias.

This study still has several limitations. Firstly, the sample size and the number of research centers included were relatively small. The study was a retrospective analysis and there may be potential bias. In addition, the laboratory indicators selected in this study were all single indicators before chemotherapy, and there was no dynamic comparison of laboratory indicators during treatment. Therefore, dynamic comparison with larger samples and multi-center prospective studies are needed to further validate these finding.

Conclusion

This study highlights that the proportions of peripheral blood T and NK lymphocytes are highly practical and efficient prognostic indicators for OS. Therefore, for OS patients, assessing peripheral blood lymphocyte proportions prior to chemotherapy provides valuable prognostic insights. When the T cell proportion is ≥ 0.741 and the NK cell proportion is ≥ 0.099, it suggests a better prognosis for the patients.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

OS:

Osteosarcoma

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

BMI:

Body mass index

CRP:

C-reactive protein

WBC:

White blood cell

AUC:

Area under the curve

TCR:

T-cell receptor

Tfh:

Follicular helper T cells

References

  1. Kansara M, Teng M, Smyth M, Thomas D. Translational biology of osteosarcoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(11):722–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nrc3838.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beird H, Bielack S, Flanagan A, Gill J, Heymann D, Janeway K, Livingston J, Roberts R, Strauss S, Gorlick R, Osteosarcoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8(1):77. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41572-022-00409-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown J, Steffensen A, Trump B. Clinical features and overall survival of osteosarcoma of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;52(5):524–30. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.10.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costelloe C, Macapinlac H, Madewell J, Fitzgerald N, Mawlawi O, Rohren E, Raymond A, Lewis V, Anderson P, Bassett R. 18F-FDG PET/CT as an indicator of progression-free and overall survival in osteosarcoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(3):340–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/21655979.2022.2031387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Z, Xie P, Dai Z, Wu J. Self-supervised tumor segmentation and prognosis prediction in osteosarcoma using multiparametric MRI and clinical characteristics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023;244:107974. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang H, Liu S, Luo X, Sun Y, Li X, Luo K, Liao S, Li F, Liang J, Zhan X, et al. A novel molecular signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in osteosarcoma based on tumor-infiltrating cell marker genes. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1150588. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1150588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang H, Liu D, Lu J, Liu Y. Significance of the Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte ratio in predicting the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma: A multicenter retrospective study. BMC Cancer. 2021;22(1):1–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12885-021-09130-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang X, Liu Y, Liang W, Luo K, Qin Y, Li F, Xie T, Qin H, He J, Wei Q. A new model of preoperative systemic inflammatory markers predicting overall survival of osteosarcoma: a multicenter retrospective study. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):1370. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12885-022-10477-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Xie M, Tang Y, Hu B, Li K, Li J, Liang X. Percentage of natural killer (NK) cells in peripheral blood is associated with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer: A retrospective study from a single center. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e927464. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.12659/msm.927464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang Y, Xie M, Li K, Li J, Cai Z, Hu B. Prognostic value of peripheral blood natural killer cells in colorectal cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):31. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12876-020-1177-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Henriksen J, Nederby L, Donskov F, Waldstrøm M, Adimi P, Jakobsen A, Steffensen K. Prognostic significance of baseline T cells, B cells and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in recurrent ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy. J Ovarian Res. 2020;13(1):59. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13048-020-00661-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Drawz P, Rahman M. Chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):ITC1–16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7326/AITC201506020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gines P, Krag A, Abraldes JG, Sola E, Fabrellas N, Kamath PS. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2021;398(10308):1359–76. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01374-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases. [Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure (2024 version)]. Chin J Clin Infect Dis. 2024;17(5):321–39. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2024.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Enneking W. A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;204(204):9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Delmonte O, Fleisher T. Flow cytometry: surface markers and beyond. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(2):528–37. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jaci.2018.08.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira G, Wu C. Dynamics and specificities of T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023;23(5):295–316. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41568-023-00560-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu J, Kang X, Wang Z, Zhao G, Jiang B. The activity level of follicular helper T cells in the peripheral blood of osteosarcoma patients is associated with poor prognosis. Bioengineered. 2022;13(2):3751–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/21655979.2022.2031387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao W, Zhou J, Ji B. Evidence of Interleukin 21 reduction in osteosarcoma patients due to PD-1/PD-L1-Mediated suppression of follicular helper T cell functionality. DNA Cell Biol. 2017;36(9):794–800. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1089/dna.2017.3669.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicolás G, Baumjohann D. T follicular helper cells in cancer. Trends cancer. 2023;9(4):309–25. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.trecan.2022.12.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Myers J, Miller J. Exploring the NK cell platform for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18(2):85–100. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41571-020-0426-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bar M, Othus M, Park H, Sandhu V, Chen X, Wood B, Estey E. Elevated lymphocyte count at time of acute myeloid leukemia diagnosis is associated with shorter remission. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(11):3109–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3109/10428194.2015.1020060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharonov G, Serebrovskaya E, Yuzhakova D, Britanova O, Chudakov D. B cells, plasma cells and antibody repertoires in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(5):294–307. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41577-019-0257-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shang J, Zha H, Sun Y. Phenotypes, functions, and clinical relevance of regulatory B cells in cancer. Front Immunol. 2020;11:582657. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fimmu.2020.582657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang B, Vogelzang A, Miyajima M, Sugiura Y, Wu Y, Chamoto K, Nakano R, Hatae R, Menzies R, Sonomura K, et al. B cell-derived GABA elicits IL-10 macrophages to limit anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2021;599(7885):471–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41586-021-04082-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma A, Jasrotia S, Kumar A. Effects of chemotherapy on the immune system: implications for cancer treatment and patient outcomes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024;397(5):2551–66. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00210-023-02781-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. The secret ally: immunostimulation by anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11(3):215–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nrd3626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Enneking W. Staging of musculoskeletal neoplasms. Skeletal Radiol. 1985;13(3):183–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yi J, Wang D, Li Z, Hu J, Niu X, Liu X. C-reactive protein as a prognostic factor for human osteosarcoma: a meta-analysis and literature review. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(5):e94632. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0094632.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Song X, Zhang H, Yin F, Guo P, Yang X, Liu J, Han Y, Ren Z. Systemic inflammatory markers for predicting overall survival in patients with osteosarcoma: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Mediat Inflamm. 2021;2021(3456629). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2021/3456629.

  31. Weng M, Zhao W, Yue Y, Guo M, Nan K, Liao Q, Sun M, Zhou D, Miao C. High preoperative white blood cell count determines poor prognosis and is associated with an immunosuppressive microenvironment in colorectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:943423. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fonc.2022.943423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Marulanda G, Henderson E, Johnson D, Letson G, Cheong D. Orthopedic surgery options for the treatment of primary osteosarcoma. Cancer Control. 2008;15(1):13–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/107327480801500103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhong W, Luo W, Lin Z, Wu Z, Yuan Y, He Y. Prognostic analysis of telangiectatic osteosarcoma of the extremities. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1105054. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fonc.2022.1105054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grinberg S, Posta A, Weber K, Wilson R. Limb salvage and reconstruction options in osteosarcoma. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1257:13–29. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-43032-0_2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the staff of the participating departments.

Funding

This study was funded by Youth Science and Technology Project of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (201903038), the National Natural Science Foundation of China Guangxi Key Research and Development Program (Guike 22035014), First-class discipline innovation-driven talent program of Guangxi Medical University, “Medical Excellence Award” Funded by the Creative Research Development Grant from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dehuai Liu, Juliang He and Yun Liu were responsible for conception, design, quality control of this study, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. Kai Luo, Haijun Tang, Weijie Yan and Shanhang Li was responsible for conception, design, quality control of this study, statistical analyses, and manuscript writed. Xiaoting Luo, Mingxiu Yang and Feicui Li were responsible for data collection, Jiming Liang and Shijie Liao were responsible for proofreading and patient’s follow-up. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and all aspects of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yun Liu, Juliang He or Dehuai H. Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University and Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. The study was conducted in strict accordance with all relevant guidelines and regulations. As a retrospective cohort study, it involved only the collection of clinical data from patients, without any intervention in their treatment plans or exposure to additional physiological risks.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, K., Tang, H., Yan, W. et al. Prognostic significance of T cells and NK cells in osteosarcoma: a dual-center retrospective study. World J Surg Onc 23, 130 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12957-025-03784-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12957-025-03784-4

Keywords